Nomenclature Meeting 09 10 A1

(SORTED FROM NEW-OLD)

Donald_NSP_Romeo: Oh my fucking god. Let's make sure that all R politicians we know passes the nomenclature test.

HnsWrdNSP: That is the case. Yes.

SydneyMarianette_NSP: So you are implying that Charlie Kirk's death was the first documented, and witnessed event that was caused by (((dumb metalawyers)))? It's true that the list only banned Carl, and Charles, but not Char-lie (Charlie).

[Banned] Content Name: Carl and Charles Syndromeist Content.

Reason: Blatant pro-leftist and pro-DEI glowie narrative push.

HnsWrdNSP: Ch[arlie] [Kirk] » Arlie Quirk. Quirk for R. Since it is not Charles.

ArFlame_NSP: HnsWrdNSP, what does Charlie Kirk actually mean in the meta sense?

SydneyMarianette_NSP: Too late, sadly. If there was an anchor to him somehow, he would've actually survived.

HnsWrdNSP: [Char]lie [Ja]mes Kirk. If he used the full name sequence, he wouldn't have passed the nomenclature check, but he used the Charlie Kirk frontname, and since that is that in electoral terms he is a tilt R name. So he isn't one of them. I even followed, and checked his accounts, and Turning Point US, so the blame's not on me. If there is anyone here is to blame, it is the quiqees.

Donald_NSP_Romeo: Here comes the part where I nervously ask… does Charlie Kirk pass the criterion for an acceptable R name?

HnsWrdNSP: I define Metalawyer L names as Metalawyers who have intent to do leftist, and/or are leftist. This is not limited to the choice of content down to the gray lines of the L-Name-in-question. Making a professional scale of this caliber is tricky, so this can't be scaled and has to be done manually case-to-case basis at certain points. HOWEVER, we can determine the percentage of what is an acceptable baseline nomenclature by looking at the theme of the name poster, and what he/she meta-represents.

This is why Nickposters never pass the Nomenclature check, because all of them are corrupt L names.

SydneyMarianette_NSP: Ok, I'm gonna make this post really clear for every NSP Staff Member to see.

You see, NSP as we (The NSP Staff) know that we have a strong, brutal, and harsh nomenclature lockdown going on.

I propose this schizo meta meeting under the following grounds: To plug metanarrative loopholes, and prevent meta-misunderstandings for metalawyers to base on.

I hereby propose the question: So what exactly are the grounds of being a banned L name, and what is not technically an L name, but not L name?